王聪等:Analysis of Differences in Phenology Extracted from the Enhanced Vegetation Index and the Leaf Area Index
被阅读 157 次
2017-10-19
Analysis of Differences in Phenology Extracted from the Enhanced Vegetation Index and the Leaf Area Index
作者:Wang, C (Wang, Cong)[ 1,2 ] ; Li, J (Li, Jing)[ 1 ] ; Liu, QH (Liu, Qinhuo)[ 1,2 ] ; Zhong, B (Zhong, Bo)[ 1 ] ; Wu, SL (Wu, Shanlong)[ 1 ] ; Xia, CF (Xia, Chuanfu)[ 1 ]
SENSORS
卷: 17  期: 9
文献号: 1982
DOI: 10.3390/s17091982
出版年: SEP 2017
 
摘要
Remote-sensing phenology detection can compensate for deficiencies in field observations and has the advantage of capturing the continuous expression of phenology on a large scale. However, there is some variability in the results of remote-sensing phenology detection derived from different vegetation parameters in satellite time-series data. Since the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and the leaf area index (LAI) are the most widely used vegetation parameters for remote-sensing phenology extraction, this paper aims to assess the differences in phenological information extracted from EVI and LAI time series and to explore whether either index performs well for all vegetation types on a large scale. To this end, a GLASS (Global Land Surface Satellite Product)-LAI-based phenology product (GLP) was generated using the same algorithm as the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer)-EVI phenology product (MLCD) over China from 2001 to 2012. The two phenology products were compared in China for different vegetation types and evaluated using ground observations. The results show that the ratio of missing data is 8.3% for the GLP, which is less than the 22.8% for the MLCD. The differences between the GLP and the MLCD become stronger as the latitude decreases, which also vary among different vegetation types. The start of the growing season (SOS) of the GLP is earlier than that of the MLCD in most vegetation types, and the end of the growing season (EOS) of the GLP is generally later than that of the MLCD. Based on ground observations, it can be suggested that the GLP performs better than the MLCD in evergreen needleleaved forests and croplands, while the MLCD performs better than the GLP in shrublands and grasslands.
 
通讯作者地址: Li, J; Liu, QH (通讯作者)
Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China.
通讯作者地址: Liu, QH (通讯作者)
Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China.
地址:
[ 1 ] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Remote Sensing & Digital Earth, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[ 2 ] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China